SPRING 2010
(Q1-2010 Data)
Volume 20, Number 2
ewgate’s Municipal Income Portfolio rose 4.4%
during the first quarter, compared to a 1.5%
gain for the Lipper Municipal Fund Index.
Market Review. “Is this a recovery, or just the
next phase of the crisis?” That is the implicit question
running through the global markets. Near zero
interest rates, quantitative easing (central bank purchases
of its own government’s bonds, a fancy way of
saying “printing money”) and fiscal stimulus appear
to have put the global economy on the right path.
But is the economy strong enough to survive the withdrawal
of government stimulus? Or are we now set for
a hyper-inflationary environment due to excess liquidity?
No one knows for certain, but the truth usually lies
between the extremes. What we do know is that fear drove money into
government bonds, especially US Treasuries. Now with
bond yields low, and the need for real return and confidence
increasing, long dated Treasury securities
seem like the worst of a series of uncertain options.
During the quarter, spreads on municipal bonds
relative to Treasuries narrowed, making municipals
increasingly attractive. This was especially true on the
short end of the curve. By March 31, AA rated municipal
bonds shorter than 2 years in maturity had higher
yields than Treasuries. The same was true for bonds
with maturities greater than 20 years.
Municipalities have been taking advantage of lower
interest rates by issuing new bonds, either to refinance
existing debt or fund new projects. Over $105 billion
of municipal bonds were issued in the first quarter of
2010, compared with $88 billion last year. Much of this
issuance has come from the Build America Bonds program,
where municipalities issue bonds with taxable
coupons, but the Federal government subsidizes the
issuers themselves. Taxable investors get a tax equivalent
yield comparable to that of traditional municipal
bonds, but issuers get a low cost of funding due to the
subsidy. One positive effect of the program is that foreign
investors, who normally would not participate in
the asset class at all, purchased over $60 billion dollars
worth in 2009.
Credit quality remains the largest source of concern
in the municipal market. Stories abound of cash
strapped cities and states wrestling with budget shortfalls.
However, it seems that most (though not all)
stressed issuers of general obligation bonds are at a
political, not an economic, crossroads. When it comes
to credit quality, the situation is improving marginally.
Data suggest that state tax collections for the first quarter
rose unexpectedly, though they are well below 2008
levels. States still need to repair their finances, but the
situation is less urgent than it was months ago.
A factor affecting the market for municipal closed-end
funds has been their ability to find new vehicles
for leverage. The failure of the Auction Rate Preferred
(ARP) market caused concern that closed-end funds
were no longer a viable investment vehicle. While the
refinancing of funds from ARPs to alternative structures
is a process that will take some time, it does
appear that the market is accepting these new structures.
There are now even ETFs that purchase these
new structures, increasing the liquidity in the short
end of the market.
Portfolio Activity. Inherent value in the
municipal bond market encouraged investors to buy
closed-end funds. Fund discounts narrowed; some
funds, especially leveraged funds, began to trade at
premiums. We increased allocations to unleveraged
funds to reduce risk and duration. ETFs also play a
role in this strategy. There is still value in state-specific
funds like the Blackrock Muniyield California Insured
Fund (MCA) with a 6.1% yield and a 9.8% discount.
Outlook. Municipal bonds are at attractive levels
relative to Treasuries. They also represent a logical“first step” for investors looking to increase yield
in their portfolios. The expectation of rising tax rates
not only shores up credit quality for borrowers, but
makes tax exempt income more valuable to investors.
As interest rates rise, diversification and duration management
will be vital for success. An actively managed
portfolio of closed-end funds seeks to provide both. |